The 2013 Mac Pro starts at 12GB of 1866MHz DDR3 ECC memory (configurable up to 16GB) - compared to 6GB of 1066MHz DDR3 ECC SDRAM memory in the 2012 Mac Pro.īecause the ECC DDR3 runs at 1866 MHz with a four-channel memory controller, the 2013 Mac Pro has up to 60GBps of memory bandwidth. Specifically, the new Mac Pro has "double the floating point performance" of the 2012 Mac Pro. So, what does all that mean? The 2013 Mac Pro packs "amazing performance," Apple said. The 2012 Mac Pro has a 3.2GHz quad-core Intel Xeon W3565 processor with 8 MB of 元 cache (or two 2.4 GHz 6-Core Intel Xeon Westmere-EP processors with 12 MB of 元 cache). The 2013 Mac Pro comes with 3.7GHz quad-core Intel Xeon X5 with 10MB 元 cache (configurable up to 3.5GHz 6-core processors with 12MB 元 cache). This subsequently lowers the 30dBA acoustic level of the 2012 Mac Pro to just 12dBA for the 2013 Mac Pro. "It works by conducting heat away from the CPU and GPUs and distributing that heat uniformly across the core."Īpple also engineered a single, larger fan that pulls air upward through a bottom intake, allowing air to pass vertically through the center of the device, absorbing heat and carrying it out the top. "Rather than using multiple heat sinks and fans to cool the processor and graphics cards, we built everything around a single piece of extruded aluminum designed to maximize airflow as well as thermal capacity," Apple said. Look and feel aside, one of the unique aspects to the 2013 Mac Pro is its unified thermal core and cooling system. The thermal core will come in handy when one processor isn’t working as hard as the others are, because the extra thermal capacity will distribute equally among all of them. For comparison, the 2012 Mac Pro is a 20.1-inch-tall rectangle box. The entire enclosure is cylindrical, sleek, lighter and smaller at just 9.9 inches tall with a diameter of 6.6 inches. The desktop has adopted a new design - which many have compared to a Braun coffee maker. The "cheese grater" look of the old Mac Pro, which debuted in 2003 with the Power Mac G5, is gone forever. Phil Schiller, Apple's senior VP of worldwide marketing, said: "The new Mac Pro is our vision for the future of the pro desktop, everything about it has been reimagined and there has never been anything like it."īut how does it set the bar higher? We've quickly broken it down, so you can see the exact differences between the 2013 Mac Pro and 2012 Mac Pro. It looks nothing like the 2012 Mac Pro, and the price hike it comes with is just as drastic too.Īpple has explained away the £2,499 price tag for the base model by emphasising it reinvented the Mac Pro from the inside out and designed it to tackle the most demanding workflows. We have a funny feeling a good amount of you will take the latter option.(Pocket-lint) - Apple has announced the release date and pricing details for the new, cylindrical Mac Pro.
Mac pro 5.1 year Pc#
What your left with is the choice of either dropping macOS and going for a modern PC or waiting it out for Apple to deliver on its promise of a modular Mac Pro this year. So, while the desire for a better Mac Pro that serves the needs of a wider gamut of professionals and power users is easy to understand (and something still not achieved by the 2017 iMac Pro), it’s as tough for us as it is for ExtremeTech to recommend going this route when you’re already touching the ceiling of what’s possible on the 2012 Mac Pro platform. Resellers can add these features through third-party parts, which you’d surely pay extra for. Not to mention that this logic board doesn’t support modern features that the work world now thrives on, like Thunderbolt 3 and USB 3.1.
Considering that modern workstations include chips with 12-cores on a single die that can then be configured in tandem from there, you’re missing out on a lot of speed. However, the absolute fastest processor setup that’s compatible with a 2012 Mac Pro’s logic board is a pair of Intel Xeon X5690 CPUs, a six-core chip with a 3.46GHz base and 3.73GHz turbo clock speed.
Mac pro 5.1 year professional#
If you’re a professional or power user that relies on graphical output, then this seems like a far better solution than AMD’s far-dated GCN 1.0 architecture within the 2013 Mac Pro. That includes niceties of 2012 that have all but become necessities in 2018, like multiple drive bays and the ability to use modern graphics cards in SLI (Nvidia) or CrossFire (AMD) configurations. That’s because, while the 2012 Mac Pro is limited by what logic board and processor it can accept, it offers features that the 2013 edition simply can’t. Image Credit: Big Little Frank No two Mac Pro editions are made alike